BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CPCS Website - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.publiccounsel.net
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CPCS Website
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20220101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230201T140000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230201T153000
DTSTAMP:20260502T234619
CREATED:20230729T221146Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230729T221146Z
UID:10000620-1675260000-1675265400@www.publiccounsel.net
SUMMARY:Jake J. Go Away: Challenging Release Conditions ordered under c. 276\, § 87
DESCRIPTION:Children charged with crimes in Massachusetts are often subjected to onerous pretrial conditions pursuant to G.L. c. 276\, § 87\, which permits judges to impose any pretrial condition of release if the youth consents to its imposition. These conditions are monitored by probation officers\, who receive school reports\, demand urine tests for drug screens\, talk to parents and DCF workers about behaviors at home\, and bring forth violation proceedings subjecting youth to DYS detention for up to 90 days—all before a youth has been adjudicated delinquent or pleaded to sufficient facts. And\, often\, a youth’s “consent” to such conditions is coerced by the threat of detention.\nThis training will explore how to strategically challenge conditions imposed under § 87 in Juvenile Courts. Materials will include a sample motion with accompanying affidavits\, a Quick Reference Guide and a sample 211/3. \nTopic: Jake J. Go Away: Challenging Release Conditions ordered under c. 276\, § 87\nTime: Feb 1\, 2023\, 02:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) \nRegistration Link:\n\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZModeisrjwoH9UpYEKBRY87feWtl9A08xKl
URL:https://www.publiccounsel.net/event/jake-j-go-away-challenging-release-conditions-ordered-under-c-276-%c2%a7-87/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20230201T140000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20230201T160000
DTSTAMP:20260502T234619
CREATED:20230729T222746Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230729T222746Z
UID:10000701-1675260000-1675267200@www.publiccounsel.net
SUMMARY:Litigating Complex Rule 30 Motions: Case Studies in What Worked
DESCRIPTION:This webinar series offers practical\, case-based strategies for evaluating and building a record in support of Rule 30 motions that relate to three common causes of wrongful convictions: Eyewitness Identifications\, False/ Coerced Confessions\, and Brady Violations. Using concrete examples from successful cases\, each two hour session will walk participants through the steps needed to identify\, investigate and present claims involving one of these subject areas.\nFeb. 1\, 2023: Eyewitness Identifications. In this session\, Innocence Program Staff Counsel Jill Tessier and eyewitness ID expert Dr. Nancy Franklin will discuss their approaches to identifying sources of eyewitness error and working with experts to effectively present them in court. Attorney Merritt Schnipper will then describe the role that eyewitness error claims played in overturning the 1976 murder conviction of Raymond Gaines. \n Feb. 8\, 2023: Brady violations. In this session\, Innocence Program Director Lisa Kavanaugh and Attorneys Jeff Harris and Chauncey Wood will explore the unique challenges of uncovering evidence of Brady violations. Using concrete examples from their own cases\, they will describe the specific strategies they employed to develop\, document and litigate Brady claims. Participants will also hear from MA exoneree Robert Foxworth\, who will talk about the importance of partnering with your client to develop and present these claims. \nFeb. 15\, 2023: False and unreliable confessions. In this session\, Innocence Program Staff Counsel Libby Hugetz will provide a brief introduction about how to identify the various forms of false and coerced confessions. Participants will then hear from Attorney Charlotte Whitmore\, BC Innocence Program\, and Jim Trainum\, interrogation expert/retired DC homicide detective\, on how to best collaborate in such cases through the lens of a previously litigated successful Innocence Program case. \n**Each webinar has been approved for 2.0 CLE credits per virtual session\, or 6.0 CLE credits total\, for attorneys on the Private Counsel Division criminal trial and appeals panels and the YAD trial and appeals panels.** \nRegister here.  \nPlease contact Lisa Kavanaugh (lkavanaugh@localhost/cpcs) with any questions
URL:https://www.publiccounsel.net/event/litigating-complex-rule-30-motions-case-studies-in-what-worked/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR